How is the authors description of the fourth amendment different from that described in the district court dismissal of aclu v. clapper

Question

20-12-2022
English

Answered

How is the authors description of the fourth amendment different from that described in the district court dismissal of aclu v. clapper

Answer :

Other Questions

The first part of my life was rather unlucky, as i was placed in a family who judged ignorance the best and only security for obedience.—a little reading and wr

Part B You've also identified the main idea of "Problems with Digital Textbooks ". Based on the main idea, describe what the text is about in approximately 50

Select the correct answer from the drop-down menu. Read the excerpt from "A Country Cottage." Then complete the sentence. The setting at the beginning of the st

"kids at work" gives the reader some historical information about the time and place where "Rocks in My pocket is set. Compare and contrast the conditions descr

Which sentence in this passage from Herman Melville’s short story "Bartleby, the Scrivener" is an example of verbal ironyBartleby, the Scrivenerby Herman Melvil

Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition age 75 - 84

Read the quotation from "that i did always love." that i did always love i bring thee proof that till i loved i never lived—enough— what is the effect of the us

Which two details work together to connect to the author's idea that the number of mosquitoes were increasing? (4) on the nyarling, in early july, the number wa

The word radianthas...wo....e four.....three...sylables, The letter in the word is pronounced like the lin the word slipperSelect the correct answer from each d

english 9 checkpoint 1 - part 1 select the sentence from the excerpt that best shows that the narrator uses his past experiences to think about the future.

Qwpanda Qwpanda · Answer 1 · 2022-12-24T13:06:43-05:00

The complaint contends that the trawl disregards the right to security safeguarded by the Fourth Amendment as well as the freedoms of discourse and affiliation safeguarded by the Principal Amendment.

The complaint additionally charges that the program surpasses the power that Congress gave in Segment 215 of the Patriot Act. In May 2015, the Court of Allures for the Subsequent Circuit decided that the call-records program abuses Area 215 of the Patriot Act. Weeks after the fact, on June 1, 2015, Area 215 momentarily terminated interestingly since the entry of the Patriot Act in 2001. The following day, Congress passed the USA Freedom Act, which altered Segment 215 to preclude the mass assortment of Americans' call records. On June 5, 2013, The Gatekeeper uncovered subtleties of the NSA's homegrown spying activities, including a mystery request from the Unfamiliar Knowledge Reconnaissance Court (FISC) to Verizon Business Organization Services. The request expected the organization to turn over "a continuous consistent schedule" call subtleties including whom calls are put to and from, when those calls are made, and the way long they last. This data, known as metadata, can uncover cozy insights regarding our confidential lives. On June 11, the ACLU and NYCLU, the two of which are current or late Verizon Business clients, documenting the claim to end the public authority's call-following project and have each of the gathered information erased. In December 2013, a bureaucratic adjudicator conceded the public authority's movement to excuse, and we effectively pursued it.

To learn more about law and order,

https://brainly.com/question/29455194

#SPJ4