In the case of ___, a court declared that dog sniffs are searches and can be conducted only if police have probable cause to believe the person, place, or thing to be sniffed is connected to criminal action.
A: US v. Place.
B: Loving v. Virginia.
C: Craig v. Boren.
D: Commonwealth v. Johnston.



Answer :

Option D, Commonwealth v. Johnston a court declared that dog sniffs are searches and can be conducted only if police have probable cause to believe it is connected to criminal action.

To match evidence gathered at a crime scene to the scent of a suspect or body, organizations deploy trained dogs. As opposed to a real corpse, drug cache, or other tangible proof of a crime, testimony from dog handlers is increasingly considered as direct evidence of guilt. In Rodriguez v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police officers cannot prolong a traffic stop in order to use a dog sniff unless they have a reasonable suspicion of a crime. Nevertheless, when conducting traffic stops, cops are typically allowed to utilize canines to sniff out vehicles.

Know more about the evidence at: https://brainly.com/question/15880833

#SPJ4