In the essay "Who speaks for 1%?," the author's main argument is that the majority of people in society do not depend on the elites, who are the most influential, wealthy, talented, or educated members of a group, community, etc.
The author of the article "Who Speaks for the 1%?" asserts that he wants to represent the 1%. These are the powerful elites who have economic interests that need to be protected. No one, according to the author, pays attention to or defends the interests of these people.
The post makes it clear that the author does not actually hold this perspective, nevertheless. In his opinion, the 1% are not in fact misunderstood. Instead, he thinks that those in the top 1% are to blame for the catastrophe. In order to highlight the elite's contribution to the catastrophe, the author wishes to mock their complaints.
To know more about Main Idea, refer to this link:
https://brainly.com/question/29550336
#SPJ4