explain one of the versions of the fact-value problem. explain what, according to the theorist whose version you chose, that means for ethics. explain as you would to someone who is unfamiliar with this course.



Answer :

The (value) fact problem is a fine line between what is true and what is right. That is the root of the discrepancy between science and ethics.

Facts are the true state of the world. Value is anything that is beautiful or considered good.

  • Hilary Putnam has spent much of her time challenging the distinction between facts and values.Facts are viewed as objective worldly realities, whereas values ​​are subjective or intersubjective projections.

  • According to Putnam, this paradox is the root cause of value subjectivism. John Searle also tries to derive the "should" from the "is". He seeks to show that the act of promising by definition creates obligations, and that obligations correspond to oughts.

  • Kant's ethics revolves around the concept of the "categorical imperative". It is a universal ethical principle that states that we should always be aware of the humanity of others and act only in accordance with principles that apply to all.

Why is factual analysis important?

Fact-finding and data analysis are essential to forming accurate hypotheses about a customer's current business needs and potential solutions. Conducting proper due diligence of a business acquisition is essential to gain full transparency about the target company's business.

Learn more about fact value:

brainly.com/question/28533183

#SPJ4