Answer :
According to the Median Voter Theorem, "a bigger percentage of voters will generally choose the outcome that the middle voter favors" Due to the crucial political contest that is meant to determine a group's chances of holding office, this is how. The Median Voter Theorem works well in this situation because the competitors must understand its advantages rather than the general political race, which determines who holds the position. However, in these kinds of circumstances, where a standard arrangement is available, the Median Voter Theorem has some limitations, and in all races, each candidate must take a different stance on various issues.
When there is a national or party-wise consensus about an issue, such as the fight against debasement, the rival for the most part follows the Median voter hypothesis. This is the case when the up-and-comer either attempted to follow the middle voter or the scenario.
In the second scenario, the challenger did not adhere to the middle voter concept since it only needed to appease a small group of supporters or members of a particular social class, "Like a cut in the Tax on the Well Off."
Since the up-and-coming candidate's situation differs from the middle voter hypothesis, the applicant acted consciously when they decided not to follow it, increasing their chances of success or growing their notoriety in a particular section of society.
To the extent that the person acted morally, this has a place with the competitors' assertion of an immeasurable moral norm.
A populace selects a person or people to hold public office through the formal process of voting in an election. Duncan Black proposed the median voter theorem in 1948 in relation to ranked preference voting.
In Unit 6, you learned about the Median Voter Theorem and how politicians will do best in the election if they identify the median voter’s position in whatever constituency they are appealing to. Why does this strategy sometimes result in a candidate seeming to change his or her positions when moving from a primary to a general election? Now, give an example of a situation where you think a candidate either attempted to follow the median voter, or a situation in which he or she did NOT attempt to move to the median voter’s position. Do you think the candidate in your example behaved strategically? Do you think he or she behaved ethically?
Learn more about Median Voter Theorem here:
https://brainly.com/question/15579425
#SPJ4
