For example: Abortion; Biomedical Issues (IVF, Stem Cell Research, etc.); Capital Punishment; Church-State Relations; Economics; Environment; Euthanasia; Just War; LGBTQ Issues; Marriage & Family; Healthcare; Political Engagement; Poverty; Racism and Race Issues; Sexual Ethics, etc.
Second, based on the ethical theory you defended in Discussion: Compare and Contrast Metaethical Theories, formulate an ethical application on this specific issue in a thread. You are expected to use both textbooks as well as outside academic sources to support your analysis and argument. As you write your thread, consider the following structure for your essay:

Step 1: Briefly summarize what theory you defended in "Discussion: Compare and Contrast Metaethical Theories" and what applied issue you are addressing in this discussion. If you have changed your mind on which theory from Discussion: Compare and Contrast Metaethical Theories you think is stronger, you may write an application for the theory you now think is the stronger theory. For example, if you defended egoism and now think a Christian ethical theory is stronger, you may apply a Christian ethical theory.
Step 2: Develop a thorough application based on your theory. This should be the bulk of your thread.
Step 3: Briefly describe a strong counterargument to your application and respond to it. For now, keep it brief (no more than one paragraph). In the capstone essay assignment, you will have more room to elaborate.

A minimum of 500-600 words. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 1 scholarly citation in Turabian format. Biblical references are highly encouraged, but will not count as an academic source.