When a plaintiff in a strict liability lawsuit has used a product in a way that is not intended or that the defendant could not have reasonably foreseen, the defendant may assert which defense?.

Question

21-09-2022
Law

Answered

When a plaintiff in a strict liability lawsuit has used a product in a way that is not intended or that the defendant could not have reasonably foreseen, the defendant may assert which defense?.

Answer :

Other Questions

What does it mean when the jury must decide based on a preponderance of evidence? O That they must decide it is more likely than not that a party is responsible

2. Identify and define the 4 culpable mental states? Give an example for each of the four culpable mental states. For example, a defendant that drag races in a

The prosecutor handling a criminal case is preparing her strategy for trial. She has several pieces of solid proof that the defendant is guilty of credit card f

An interpreter in court protects which rights of a defendant who does not speak English fluently? O First Amendment right to free speech. O Seventh Amendment ri

if an appeal court, openly and without explanation, disregards the proven fraud by the federal judge, what is the plaintiff's next step?

Has the NSA and other government agencies that collect individual data overstepped beyond the original intentions of the Patriot Act? Do you feel safer knowing

Ethical preferences are not preselected for us by legislators or by judges; they involve critical consciousness, engaging each of us in a process of bringing re

The 10th amendment says, the powers not delegated to the united states by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respe

A police officer stops a motorists driving down a highway known for it's high rate of drug trafficking for speeding. Upon issuing the citation, the officers ask

In saying that criminologists have to study the process of lawbreaking, Edwin H. Sutherland meant that they should particularly determine whether someone has v

Qwind Qwind · Answer 1 · 2022-09-23T17:46:43-04:00

Strict liability is the defense you may assert.

In terms of products responsibility, irrespective of the defendant's intention, a defendant is liable if the plaintiff can demonstrate that the product is faulty.

Regardless of the steps taken to avoid harm, a defendant who participated in an unusually risky sport will be held held responsible any evidence of negligence—for any personal injuries and damages to property brought on by the action.

To succeed in an absolute liability action, you must first sustain harm. Second, you need to demonstrate that the harm was brought on by the defendant's goods or behavior. You can sue for your losses without having to prove fault as long as their actions caused your damages and the situation falls within strict liability laws.

To know more about liability lawsuit, visit the link:

https://brainly.com/question/28173731

#SPJ4