chloeaidan09
Answered

subject is Psychology

PLEASEEEE ANSWER and please answer all the questions ASAP!


Scenario:


Naomi's good friend tells Naomi that she has an opportunity for her to make some extra money. Her friend asks Naomi for $100 and tells her she will get back $250 by the end of the week. Naomi doesn't ask for specific details but gets the impression that the opportunity is not on the "up and up."


Reflection Questions:


Does Naomi have a responsibility to make sure she understands the specific details of the opportunity before deciding whether to lend her money? Explain why or why not:


Should Naomi lend her friend $100 with the promised return of $250? Explain why or why not:


Explain how Naomi's decision in Question 2 demonstrates a pre-conventional, conventional, or post-conventional level of moral reasoning in complete sentences:



Answer :

ogorwyne

Yes we can say that Naomi would have the responsibility of trying to understand the specific details of this contract before she would decide to lend her friend the money.

Why Naomi has to lend her friend the money

The reason why Naomi would have to lend the money is that as the lender, when her friend pays her back the money she would have earned interest on the money that was lent to her. Hence Naomi would be a 140 dollars richer based on this.

Naomi needs to be able to understand all of the terms that has to do with the money especially when it comes to the payment and the interest during payback. They could have this in writing as well.

This is the post conventional reasoning because Naomi would be putting the gains that she would be making first and not just lending the money to her friend based on friendship sake. She would be making a wise choice by trading.

Read more on lending money here: https://brainly.com/question/26499492

#SPJ1

Other Questions