How did the interaction and conflict between english settlers and indians affect both parties, and contribute to developments that neither group sought?

Question

25-08-2022
History

Answered

How did the interaction and conflict between english settlers and indians affect both parties, and contribute to developments that neither group sought?

Answer :

Other Questions

these two elements represent key technological developments in gothic architecture that allow for the combination of light, height and vaulting in a masonry str

How did the French and Indian War lead to tension between the colonists and the British government?

page(s) 23-24 1.2. summarize the significant developments in europe that enabled the age of exploration. identify the main tenets of luther’s protestant reform

What do the Karuk and Maidu peoples have in common? A. They both grew crops. B. They both did artistic basket weaving. C. They both lived in southern California

while some evidence indicates that early american colonists did not enjoy leisure pursuits, a few scholars have published their own interpretations of puritanis

Use CER 1.Why was federal land grant legislation so contentious? 2.In your opinion, did the Homestead Act of 1862 contribute to the onset of the Civil War? 3. W

it was introduced by spanish colonists. it was introduced by english colonists. officers received grants in the form of american indians. tobacco plantation own

letter project short and simple need HELP !!!! ! 100points Introduce yourself and explain that you have been reading about the beginnings of the Renaissance. D

HELP ME PLEASE ASAPComplete the chart. Refer to the lessons in Module Six to describe the S.P.R.I.T.E. categories as they relate to Ancient India. Some of the c

1) True or False: History is only the study of people? (Circle your choice.) 4) Respond to the following question using a strong response, and specific examples

okpalawalter8 okpalawalter8 · Answer 1 · 2022-08-30T12:11:07-04:00

English settlers and Indians had good and bad interactions and conflicts. Since the English stole Indian territory, their relationship was adversarial. When not at war with the Natives, the English forced commerce.

After the first and second Anglo-Powhatan wars, English sickness ended their peace deal. As the English were determined to exterminate the Natives, they lacked food, forcing many to starve. Neither English nor Indians benefited from their interactions.

This is further explained below.

How did the interaction and conflict between English settlers and Indians affect both parties, and contribute to developments that neither group sought?

Generally, Both English settlers and Indians benefited and suffered from their involvement in the battle between the two groups. The relationship between the English settlers and the Indians was fraught and antagonistic when the Europeans stole Indian territory.

The English fought the Native Americans often, reducing their numbers, and when they weren't at war, they forced commerce. After the first and second Anglo-Powhatan wars, the peace deal between the two sides was broken because the English had introduced illnesses to the natives.

In conclusion, many Native Americans perished from starvation because the English were so intent on eradicating them that they stunted agricultural production. Therefore, the interactions between the English and the Indians were of little advantage to either culture.