Answer :
When we arrive at a generalization about an entire group of things after observing just some members of the group, we are making a(n) enumerative induction.
Traditional syllogistic logic has a hesitant child called enumerative induction. It exists in part because something like to it is commonplace and in part because the syllogistic logic model enables its definition.
Nevertheless, the range of enumerative induction is somewhat constrained. This method of induction can only be used to support assertions that use basic universal conditions and assertions about the prevalence of a certain attribute in a population.
A logic of evidential support is an inductive logic. In a deductive logic, a valid deductive argument's premises logically entail its conclusion, which means that any logically conceivable set of circumstances that may result in the premises being true must also result in the conclusion being true. As a result, the conclusion is completely supported by the premises of a sound deductive argument. This notion is expanded to less convincing arguments via an inductive logic.
Learn more about enumerative induction here
https://brainly.com/question/17108659
#SPJ4