According to thamhain and wilemon, authority is the legitimate hierarchical right to issue orders.
How can hierarchical metropoles or cores justify their power or rule? How does resistance differ based on their methods of legitimation? With an emphasis on the variety in cores' legitimation tactics, this theory note reconsiders how legitimation functions in hierarchies. I contend that various justifications for hierarchical legitimacy influence both core-level activity and periphery-level resistance. I create a four-part, two-axes-differentiated taxonomy of legitimation tactics.
On the first, cores can be either universalist, in which case there are no true equals, or competitive, in which case other cores are seen as peer rivals. On the second, they may primarily internalize new legitimacy claims, depending on their own political traditions, or externalize new legitimacy claims, appropriating the claims of others. These tactics influence the possibilities that are open to competitor revisionism and subordinate hierarchical opposition.
To learn more about legitimate hierarchical from the link:
https://brainly.com/question/17710919
#SPJ4