"Border walls are fundamental to national security. They have been proven
to deter illegal immigration and keep nations safer by protecting against
terrorism."
What makes this a weak claim?
Choose 1 answer:
The author claims that walls "have been proven to deter"
immigration, but doesn't offer any evidence of that supposed proof.
The author claims that walls are "fundamental to national security"
but doesn't offer any suggestions for alternatives.
The author claims that border walls "have been proven to deter"
immigration, but doesn't explain what the word deter means.
The author claims that walls are "fundamental to national security,"
but doesn't define the word fundamental.
Report a problem