Read this excerpt from the majority opinion on Tinker v. Des Moines:
If a regulation were adopted by school officials forbidding
discussion of the Vietnam conflict, or the expression by
any student of opposition to it anywhere on school
property except as part of a prescribed classroom
exercise, it would be obvious that the regulation would
violate the constitutional rights of students.
What is the reasoning in this argument?
O
A. If students were kept from discussing Vietnam in school, it would
be an obvious violation of their rights, so not allowing them to
wear armbands also violates their rights.
​