1. Scientists circulated petitions to express their fears about how the atomic
bomb would be used. Examine the outcomes the scientists proposed. Which
came closest to subsequent events? Which was the most prudent? The most
honest?
2. Is it appropriate for scientists to propose how new weapons should be used?
Are they overreaching in trying to give advice in foreign affairs and military
strategy, or are they obligated to voice moral qualms?



Answer :

Other Questions