Answer :
McDonald v. Chicago (2010) case is most aligned with Justice Alito's reasoning to treat gun ownership for self-defense as a fundamental liberty.
What Explains the constitutional reasoning in McDonald v Chicago 2010?
The Supreme Court concluded in McDonald v. Chicago (2010) that the states were entitled to the Second Amendment’s right to carry arms.
What was the significance of the Supreme Court case McDonald v Chicago 2010?
In the City of Chicago case, the U.S. Supreme Court decided on June 28, 2010, by a vote of 5 to 4, that state and local governments are also covered by the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms.”
What was the most important point of the McDonald v Chicago case?
The McDonald Court ruled in a 5–4 split decision that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment incorporates and applies to the states in relation to a person’s right to keep and bear arms.
To know more about McDonald vs Chicago case:
https://brainly.com/question/29697995
# SPJ4
Other Questions
which pair of united states supreme court cases resulted in limiting the power of local governments?
the single most important indication that a case may be a false allegation of a child abduction is :
a sense of self made up of all of one's experiences within the environment is roger's definition of:
