For example: Abortion; Biomedical Issues (IVF, Stem Cell Research, etc.); Capital Punishment; Church-State Relations; Economics; Environment; Euthanasia; Just War; LGBTQ Issues; Marriage & Family; Healthcare; Political Engagement; Poverty; Racism and Race Issues; Sexual Ethics, etc.
Second, based on the ethical theory you defended in Discussion: Compare and Contrast Metaethical Theories, formulate an ethical application for this specific issue in a thread. You are expected to use both textbooks as well as outside academic sources to support your analysis and argument. As you write your thread, consider the following structure for your essay:

Step 1. In "Discussion: Compare and Contrast Metaethical Theories," summarize briefly the theory you defended and the practical problem you are addressing. If your opinion of which theory is stronger has changed after reading Discussion: Compare and Contrast Metaethical Theories, you may submit an application for the theory you now believe to be the stronger theory. For example, if you defended egoism and now think a Christian ethical theory is stronger, you may apply a Christian ethical theory.
Step 2: Develop a thorough application based on your theory. This should be the bulk of your thread.
Briefly describe a strong counterargument to your application and respond to it. For now, keep it brief (no more than one paragraph). In the Capstone Essay Assignment, you will have more room to elaborate

Students must support assertions with at least one scholarly citation in Turabian format, and the paper should be at least 500–600 words. Each reply must include at least one scholarly citation in Turabian format. Biblical references are highly encouraged but will not count as an academic source.