The graph of the quadratic equation = 2 + 1 has no -intercepts. However, Gia claims that when the graph of = 2 + 1 is translated by a distance of 1 in a certain direction, the new (translated) graph would have exactly one -intercept. Further, if = 2 + 1 is translated by a distance greater than 1 in the same direction, the new (translated) graph would have exactly two -intercepts. Support or refute Gia’s claim. If you agree with her, in which direction did she translate the original graph? Draw graphs to illustrate.