Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6:10. A multiplication table. Which statement explains whether Juliana is correct? She is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. She is correct because 6:10 can be written as 1:2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1:2. She is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. She is not correct because 6:10 is equivalent to 3:5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3:5.